Which of the following statements is consistent with Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences?

Prepare for the School Social Work Content Exam 184. Utilize flashcards and multiple choice questions with explanations. Ensure you're exam-ready!

Multiple Choice

Which of the following statements is consistent with Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences?

Explanation:
Gardner’s view is that intelligence isn’t a single, narrow capacity but a set of multiple abilities people can excel in, many of which aren’t captured by conventional school subjects. This means students can be strong in areas like interpersonal or musical skills even if they don’t perform well in traditional academics, and those strengths might be overlooked if teachers only value standard subjects. The statement that aligns with this idea is that students who don’t succeed in traditional academic subjects are likely to have other strengths that may be overlooked by teachers. It captures the core notion that diverse talents exist and should be recognized and nurtured, rather than assuming academic success is defined solely by traditional measures. Why the other ideas don’t fit: limiting intelligence to linguistic and mathematical types ignores the broader range Gardner proposed; insisting students can only excel in one academic subject contradicts the multiple-intelligences framework; and claiming that strong interpersonal and intrapersonal skills preclude academic success goes against the notion that these strengths can contribute to learning and can manifest in different, sometimes nontraditional, ways of achievement.

Gardner’s view is that intelligence isn’t a single, narrow capacity but a set of multiple abilities people can excel in, many of which aren’t captured by conventional school subjects. This means students can be strong in areas like interpersonal or musical skills even if they don’t perform well in traditional academics, and those strengths might be overlooked if teachers only value standard subjects.

The statement that aligns with this idea is that students who don’t succeed in traditional academic subjects are likely to have other strengths that may be overlooked by teachers. It captures the core notion that diverse talents exist and should be recognized and nurtured, rather than assuming academic success is defined solely by traditional measures.

Why the other ideas don’t fit: limiting intelligence to linguistic and mathematical types ignores the broader range Gardner proposed; insisting students can only excel in one academic subject contradicts the multiple-intelligences framework; and claiming that strong interpersonal and intrapersonal skills preclude academic success goes against the notion that these strengths can contribute to learning and can manifest in different, sometimes nontraditional, ways of achievement.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy